Saturday, July 30, 2016

The 90s Were Not All That


The contemporary phenomenon of Pokemon Go more than anything reflects the millenial generations nostalgia for the 90s, a time of peace and prosperity, a time of Friends and Nickelodeon and Backstreet Boys and Pokemon and so on. 

But while the 90s may have provided  movies worth watching, books worth reading and music worth listening to, like all decades the 90s had a lot of darkness as well as light. 

If you're gay, the 90s were especially a dark time with The Defense of Marriage Act, which allowed states to pass laws banning same-sex marriage. In 1998 Ellen was canceled after Ellen Degeneres came out, and the idea of an openly gay person hosting a talk show or anchoring an evening news cast was akin to being visited by an extraterrestrial being from The X-Files. Also in 1998, Matthew Shepard was tortured and beaten to death just outside Laramie, Wyoming. It wasn't until 2009 that it became a hate crime to commit harm to someone based on their sexual orientation. And it wasn't until 2000 when Vermont became the first state to allow civil-unions. 

The recent tragedy in Orlando which left 49 people dead was shocking and saddening. But in 1995 168 people were killed in the Oklahoma City Bombing, including 19 children, some of whom were babies. Hundreds more were injured. In 1993 76 people were burned alive during the Branch Davidian raid in Waco, Texas. And of course in 1999 there was the Columbine shooting in which 13 people were gunned down. And this was all during the pre-9/11 era. The crime was also a lot higher than it is now. 

Not only were there no such thing as smartphones, but if you had dial up it was impossible to talk on the phone and go on the internet at the same time, unless you had a cellphone which no kid had back then. Video streaming was slow and could take hours to download. That is why many Star Wars fans paid to see the trailer for The Phantom Menace in theaters rather than watch it online. There's a lot memes going around lamenting for the good old days of the 90s before the advent of technology when children went out and played. Well guess what? There is nothing stopping children from going outside to play! In fact I see children playing outside a lot when I house sit at my dads. There's also nothing stopping children from passing notes in class, roller-bladding, or playing jump rope. 

I believe the 90s renaissance has most to do with my generations nostalgia for their childhood, and there's nothing wrong with that. But I believe there's been so much reflection about how awesome the 90s were that we forget about all the bad stuff happened and neglect all the progress that has been made. Now that I'm finished you can go back to playing Pokemon Go. 

Thursday, July 21, 2016

Why I refuse to belive "Indepence Day: Resurgence" even exists


I highly regret paying $9 to go see Independence Day: Resurgence, the highly anticipated sequel to the 1996 blockbuster. 

Even with the $2 discount I got by signing up for AMC stubs, it was still too much for this giant heap of garbage. The film was made out of nothing but pure greed to pump whatever money 20th Century Fox and the filmmakers could get from people who were nostalgic for the first film. I didn't get to see ID4 in theaters but I did watch it often on video with my brother and grandmother after school, back in the day when VHS tapes actually existed. 

Despite all the destruction and mayhem, ID4 to me is a "fun" movie, with Will Smith's scenes the parts I enjoy the most (the scene of him dragging the alien through the desert while complaining is my absolute favorite). Now 20 yeas later Smith's Steven Hiller is dead for no other reason than Smith's refusal to take a pay cut, even though his career is not what is used to be what with his recent flops After Earth and Focus. Smith was no doubt the shinning star of the first film, so watching the sequel without him was like viewing an apple without it's core. 

In Resurgence Hiller's adopted son Dylan (Jessie T. Usher)  is now a hot shot fighter pilot like his stepfather, while his mom (Vivica A. Fox)  somehow went from being a stripper to a hospital administrator. The only exchange between Dylan and his mom is a brief telephone conversation, so when he sees her perish in a falling building the emotional payoff is lacking (I don't really care if I spoiled the movie for you. Trust me, I'm saving you nine bucks). 

James Whitmore (Bill Pullman)  is of course no longer President, but why did the writers have to write him as an old man with declining mental health? Hasn't he gone through enough with his wife being dead? And why, oh why did they replace Mae Whitman with Maika Monroe as Whitmore's daughter Patricia? It's not like Whitman's acting career is no longer active. For five years she was on the hit NBC series Parenthood and just last year she proved she could carry a film with the hit comedy The Duff. If Whitman were in this film I would this film at least one star, maybe two. Instead, I give it zero. 

What's infuriating is that the role of Patricia Whitmore wasn't even Whitman's to turn down to begin with. They cast Monroe because they saw Whitman as not being "hot enough" for a major blockbuster, which is complete bullshit because Whitman is hot. I'd even go far as to say that she's hotter than Monroe, but that's just my opinion. Seeing Monroe as Patricia was like watching paint dry. Yeah she's good looking but there's nothing really there. 

And whatever happened to David's (Jeff Goldblum) wife or ex-wife? Did she die or did they separate for good? The sequel acts as if she never existed and doesn't even matter. Just like Dylan and his mom, this shows that director Roland Emmerich and producer Dean Devlin forgot about what made the first film so special. It wasn't so much the special effects but the relationship between the characters. David and his dad drove all the way to the White House to save his ex even though she left him years ago. It was this act of heroism, to jump into harm's way to save someone you love who might not love you back anymore, which gave the audience the necessary emotional connection to the character of David Levinson. It is the relationships between the characters that connected audiences to the first film, from the relationship between David and his ex-wife to the relationship between Whitmore and his wife and daughter to the relationship between drunk fighter pilot Russell Casse (Randy Quaid) and his three children, and so on. But unfortunately in the sequel the emotional connection between the characters is entirely lacking. Sure there's Patricia and her fiance Jim Morrison (Liam Hemsworth) but there doesn't seem to be a lot of chemistry between them. It seems as if the only reason they are getting married in the first place is because they both find each other attractive, just like Heidi and Spencer find each other attractive, and just like Barbie and Ken find each other attractive.

If you haven't seen the film you're probably wondering what the film is all about. You're guess is as good as mine. Something to do with the alien queen? After the first 15 minutes I got so bored I started checking FaceBook and wasn't really paying attention because frankly I didn't care anymore. 

It seems as if I'm not the only one who was disappointed by Resurgence. While it took the first film a mere 6 days to cross the $100 million mark in the U.S. and Canada, as of this writing in it's 26th day of release the sequel has yet to cross that milestone, and that's not even accounting for ticket price inflation over the past two decades. Worldwide the sequel has made $342 million, yet that is nowhere near the juggernaut $817 million worldwide gross of the original. 

ID4 was one of those film's that should have remained as a stand alone film, just like E.T., Citizen Kane, and It's a Wonderful Life should forever be stand alone films. No matter how many sequels are made to Independence Day, the final scene in the first film will forever be the end of the franchise for me.